why are politicians not solving the energy crisis with solar panels on homes.?
solar panels on homes would reduce our consuption of coal, reduce the need for nuclear power, and create U.S. Based manufacturing for these panels, and create jobs in constuction.
Solve our energy crisis politicians, with tax incentives, or home building regulation.
Because politicians can't make you put solar panels on your home if you're building one. If you want to, do it for your own home. Oh, and another thing; politicians aren't there to solve our problems for us. They're just there to run the day-to-day business of government.
Because politicians can't make you put solar panels on your home if you're building one. If you want to, do it for your own home. Oh, and another thing; politicians aren't there to solve our problems for us. They're just there to run the day-to-day business of government.
References :
Comment by Christopher K — January 1, 2009 @ 1:35 am
http://onlyforyou.nicepage.at
you can get much information in this website, If you will check anyone blue link in website.
References :
Comment by Barbra B — January 1, 2009 @ 2:21 am
solar panels aren't very efficient and they are expensive. It would be more cost effective for that money to be put to nuclear power.
References :
Comment by KG — January 1, 2009 @ 3:09 am
People have different priorities I think and aren't putting enough pressure on the politicians to help solve the energy crisis.. Besides,they're supposed to serve and REPRESENT the people and not tell the people what to go do with themselves
References :
Comment by D_Mac — January 1, 2009 @ 3:31 am
The best solar panels today.
Can only supply around 16% of your homes energy needs and they take 25 years to pay for themselves.
And since the energy panels today, don't last 25 years.
The cost of installing solar panels, will never be recouped by the energy savings they produce.
Go search for the companies that make solar panels, they provide all the info you need.
Maybe when we can make more efficient solar panels, where they can provide more than 16% of the energy.
They might be worth while.
References :
Comment by jeeper_peeper321 — January 1, 2009 @ 4:20 am